RFF Director Lee Wasserman wrote an opinion piece, featured in the New York Times, describing a different litmus test to determine a candidate’s or elected official’s stance on climate change. Instead of focusing only on cutting emissions we should also be asking “Will [an official’s] policies lead to an increase or decrease in the amount of fossil fuels coming out the ground?” Read Lee’s take on the track records of California Governor Jerry Brown, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and New York Governor Cuomo against his proposed question here: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/25/opinion/climate-change-fossil-fuels.html
In February, the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) released a response to a U.S. Chamber of Commerce report entitled Infrastructure Lost: Why Americans Cannot Afford to “Keep It in the Ground.” The Chamber’s report appeared to state that public action designed to prevent oil and gas projects from being approved is economically misguided. In response, IEEFA used an energy and financial lens to examine the report and its efforts to affect policy and concluded that “even if the Chamber succeeded in its goal of eviscerating environmental protections, it would be not be able to overcome the market forces that threaten the profitability of the fossil fuel sector.” Read the full response here: http://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Response-to-Chamber-of-Commerce-KIITG-Movement-Analysis_February-2019.pdf
The New Hampshire Campaign for a Family Friendly Economy is hosting a series of paid leave roundtables and other events to elevate paid leave and other economic issues into the national discussion. On February 8, they hosted Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio for a paid leave roundtable. The event was covered in WMUR here: https://www.wmur.com/article/amid-2020-speculation-ohio-sen-sherrod-brown-visits-nh/26261337
RFF director, Lee Wasserman, and RFF president, David Kaiser, co-wrote an op-ed article featured in the New York Times in response to lobbyists and former Senators Trent Lott and John Breaux’s plan for a federal tax on carbon dioxide emissions. While their plan includes an initial tax of $40 on every ton of carbon dioxide emissions, the primary purpose of the plan is to give fossil fuel companies immunity from lawsuits seeking to hold them accountable for climate-change related damages—which could total trillions of dollars. To date, 14 municipalities and one state have filed damage claims against fossil fuel companies for knowingly producing a product that would cause “catastrophic” consequences.
On July 11, 2018, the Senate Finance Subcommittee on Social Security, Pensions, and Family Policy held a hearing on paid family and medical leave called “Examining the Importance of Paid Family Leave for American Working Families.” Vicki Shabo, the Vice President for Workplace Policies and Strategies at the National Partnership for Women and Families, testified alongside Dr. Andrew Biggs of the American Enterprise Institute and Carolyn O’Boyle of Deloitte. RFF is proud to be a long-time partner of the National Partnership for Women and Families and echoes Vicki Shabo’s call for a strong, inclusive, national standard of paid family and medical leave.
Earlier this month a federal judge ordered Texas counties to pause a planned voter purge that would have removed tens of thousands registered voters from the rolls. The Campaign Legal Center (CLC) represents the League of United Latin Americans Citizens (LULAC) and Julie Hilberg in the case alleging that the purge program amounted to racially motivated voter intimidation and therefore violated the Voting Rights Act and the U.S. Constitution.
The We Believe You Fund (WBYF) released its report analyzing corporations’ policies and practices around workplace sexual harassment and assault. Among its recommendations, the WBYF, a RFF-grantee, called on companies to terminate the use of NDAs and to implement and enforce baseline sexual harassment policies.
A federal district court in Boston rejected Exxon’s motion to dismiss a case brought by RFF grantee, the Conservation Law Foundation (CLF). The case concerns Exxon’s failure to safeguard a storage facility on the Mystic River in a low-income neighborhood. CLF claims the company violated the Clean Water Act and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act by not accounting for potential toxic inundation caused by climate-induced rising sea-levels.